June 21–
Summer
Institute
is designed to provide a forum and a frame in which the Wisconsin Teaching
Scholars may begin to conceptualize and work on their course redesign in terms
of the scholarship of teaching and learning.
The Scholarship of Teaching and
Learning (SOT&L) means understanding, explaining and valuing teaching
and attention to student learning as scholarly, intellectual work. Advancing this perspective requires an
academic culture that encourages the following principles:
Summer
Institute is
structured so that the mornings will be spent engaging the eight principles of
the SOT&L listed above, and the afternoons will be spent in both individual
and collaborative work on Scholar projects.
Some of the Scholars will have the opportunity to present their nascent
projects; all of the Scholars will have the opportunity to engage in and
practice peer review.
The
Wisconsin Teaching Scholars Program has three over-arching goals:
1) to provide
Scholars with the opportunity to develop their individual projects;
2) to enable
Scholars to make themselves available as resources and to collaborate with
others; and
3) to advance the
scholarship of teaching and learning.
Each
of these goals will be put into practice throughout Summer Institute.
Monday, June 21
(joint meeting with the Wisconsin
Teaching Fellows)
**Bass, Scholarship of
Teaching: What’s the Problem?
**Hutchings,
Introduction to Opening Lines
begin to design a research plan framed by SoTL question
Tuesday, June 22
Discussion
of methods
**Bransford, “How People Learn” (Chapter One)
Small group
work on evidence
Or work
individually
Or some
combination, as appropriate
Dinner on your own
Wednesday, June 23
Presentations
by 3-4 Center Scholars and past WTS
(Helena,
Nancy Chick, Donna Perkins, Cindy Kernahan)
Small group
work on project design
Or
Bransford, Chap 6 discussion
Dinner on your own
Thursday, June 24
Shulman taxonomy
Discussion
of Lee Shulman’s article, Course Anatomy: The
Dissection
and Analysis of Knowledge Through Teaching
Friday, June 25
Group
discussion of Shulman, Taking Learning Seriously
Linking your work to campus and system initiatives
does
your project differ from the traditional teaching improvement
project?
What are the big questions about student learning that we’ve made some progress
on?
expectations,
and recommendations for the coming year.
Siagenda2004-05final.doc