Financial Administration
SFS Introduction
The University of Wisconsin System has been actively in search of best business practices since 1995. One concentrated area of review has been financial systems, with the goal of identifying the most efficient and cost effective strategy for configuring and managing these systems.
A new system is needed.
The legacy system is a cash-based system, recording only revenues and
expenditures. Generally accepted accounting principles for colleges and
universities require accrual based accounting. Thus, the current system
does not meet our systemwide financial reporting responsibilities. A new
approach and a new system are critical to preventing problems in the
future.
Unity equals savings.
Individual UW Institutions have begun to make significant investments
in financial systems to accommodate the year 2000 problem. The nine
institutions who have invested in their own systems require maintenance,
upgrading and replacement with institutional resources, an increasingly
expensive strategy. It was decided to explore the premise that, given the
flexibility offered by current software, efficiencies could be obtained
with a consolidated, systemwide approach to financial systems.
Shared System
A committee of systemwide representatives surveyed other multi-campus
systems and business corporations. They identified a
shared software approach as the Best
Business Practice for Financial Systems. The Institution Business
Representatives thoroughly reviewed the proposal and committed to adopting
the shared software solution. Institutions will maintain the option of
using their own financial systems but will be responsible for ensuring
that all systemwide data needs are met.
Phases
A phased in approach will be utilized with UW-Whitewater identified
as the pilot institution. The goal is have UW System completing Phase III,
a core financial system available to all institutions, by July 1, 2001.
Flowchart
Timeline
The Software
PeopleSoft continues to have an increasing presence in the higher
education financial software arena. As a result of the significant
commitment across the UW System to PeopleSoft Student Information Systems,
they became the vendor of choice.
Before PeopleSoft can be installed, institutions will need a data base platform that can support the software. Oracle has been identified as the database that will best meet this need. It has also been singled-out across the System as the database of choice for a number of administrative, academic support and academic applications. It is likely that negotiating one large contract rather than many small contracts could save as much as 50%.
Paying for the project
In order to take the work of the committee one step further, a
Financial Resources Team and a Negotiating Team were established. The
Financial Resources Team identified principles to be associated with the
acquisition and implementation of shared financial systems, reviewed
options for borrowing cash to initiate the purchase of software, hardware
and consulting services, and came up with suggestions for on-going sources
of funds for paying back borrowed cash. It is estimated that we will incur
one-time costs of $14 million (including the oracle license) and on-going
costs of $1 million to achieve Phase III of the project.


