a. Research national trends in titling for non-tenure track instructional and research staff [REVIEW MATRIX].

b. Propose revisions to the UW System IAS and RAS titling options that better reflect national norms and trends [REVIEW UWS ARRAY].

c. Investigate titles that better reflect the work IAS and RAS are doing [REVIEW UPG & ARRAY].

d. Monitor titling change initiatives at UW-Madison and explore how efforts might serve as a model for other institutions [BRIEFING ON UW-MADISON EFFORTS / REPORT ON OTHER CAMPUS EFFORTS].

a. Survey academic personnel officers to identify changes in policy or practice occurring subsequent to the System-wide focus group meeting [BRIEFING ON March 24, 2000 FOCUS GROUP MEETINGS]

b. Assess the degree to which recommendations for institutions made in the "Teaching Academic Staff Study" have been implemented [REVIEW STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS].

c. Identify recommendations that have been problematic for institutions to implement [DISCUSS METHODS].

d. Suggest System-wide initiatives to facilitate implementation of the study's recommendations.

e. Propose revisions to recommendations put forth in the "Teaching Academic Staff in the UW System Study" and/or develop new guidelines or guiding principles.

a. Brief introduction of members / identify reporter.

b. What are the components of the final project report?

c. What information do we need?

d. Where/how will be get the information?

f. Who will be involved and serve as point person in gathering information?

e. What will we have ready for the next meeting?